Red Team Operations That Expose What Attackers Will Find First
Your firewalls are configured. Your SOC is staffed. Your SIEM is collecting logs. But would you detect a determined adversary? CyberGuards' red team operators in San Francisco simulate real-world threat actors to answer that question definitively.
Traditional Security Testing Leaves Critical Blind Spots
Compliance Does Not Equal Security
Passing a compliance audit means you checked the boxes. It does not mean a skilled adversary cannot breach your environment in hours. Organizations that rely solely on compliance-driven testing often discover the gaps only after a real incident — when the cost is measured in millions of dollars and lost customer trust.
Automated Tools Miss Context
Vulnerability scanners find known CVEs. Penetration tests find technical flaws. Neither tests whether your security team can detect an attacker who chains together low-severity findings with social engineering and lateral movement to reach your crown jewels. Real adversaries do not follow a scanner's checklist.
Full-Spectrum Red Team Operations
CyberGuards' red team engagements go beyond finding vulnerabilities. We simulate real adversaries with specific objectives — exfiltrating sensitive data, compromising critical systems, or proving a path to your most valuable assets — while measuring your team's ability to detect, respond, and contain the threat.
MITRE ATT&CK-Aligned Adversary Simulation
Every red team engagement is mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, providing your security team with a common language to understand exactly which tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) were used and where your defenses succeeded or failed.
Reconnaissance & Planning
We gather intelligence on your organization using OSINT, social media analysis, DNS enumeration, technology fingerprinting, and employee profiling. This mirrors how real threat actors build target packages before launching attacks against Bay Area organizations.
Initial Access
Using the intelligence gathered, we attempt to gain initial access through the most realistic vectors: spear phishing, vishing, physical intrusion, external exploitation, supply chain compromise scenarios, or credential stuffing with previously breached credentials.
Execution & Persistence
Once inside, we establish persistence mechanisms, deploy custom command-and-control infrastructure, and begin internal reconnaissance. We use defense evasion techniques to test whether your EDR, SIEM, and SOC can detect our presence.
Lateral Movement & Privilege Escalation
We move through your network using credential harvesting, Kerberos attacks, token manipulation, and trust relationship abuse. The goal is to reach agreed-upon objectives while documenting every technique that goes undetected.
Objective Completion
We demonstrate impact by achieving the defined objectives — whether that is accessing sensitive data, compromising domain admin, reaching segmented networks, or simulating ransomware deployment (safely). Every action is documented with timestamps.
Reporting & Debrief
We deliver a comprehensive attack narrative, MITRE ATT&CK heat map, detection gap analysis, and strategic recommendations. A debrief session walks your leadership and security teams through the full engagement timeline.
Multi-Vector Adversary Simulation
Real threat actors do not limit themselves to a single attack surface. Neither do we. CyberGuards tests all the vectors that matter.
Social Engineering
Spear phishing, vishing (voice phishing), smishing (SMS phishing), pretexting, baiting, and business email compromise simulations. We craft targeted campaigns based on real reconnaissance of your employees and organization.
Physical Security
Badge cloning, tailgating, lock bypass, dumpster diving, USB drop attacks, and facility penetration. For San Francisco and Bay Area clients, we perform on-site physical intrusion testing of offices, data centers, and branch locations.
Network Attacks
External perimeter exploitation, wireless network attacks, network segmentation bypass, man-in-the-middle attacks, DNS poisoning, and protocol-level exploitation targeting your internal and external infrastructure.
Application Attacks
Web application exploitation, API abuse, authentication bypass, business logic manipulation, and chaining application vulnerabilities with network access to demonstrate maximum impact across your application portfolio.
Cloud Attacks
AWS, Azure, and GCP misconfigurations, IAM privilege escalation, storage bucket enumeration, serverless function exploitation, container escapes, and cross-account pivot techniques targeting your cloud infrastructure.
Supply Chain
Third-party integration abuse, dependency confusion scenarios, CI/CD pipeline compromise simulations, and trusted relationship exploitation that tests your vendor security and software supply chain resilience.
What You Receive
Executive Report
A business-focused summary of the engagement including overall risk rating, key findings, business impact assessment, and strategic recommendations. Designed for board-level and C-suite stakeholders who need to understand organizational risk without technical jargon.
Technical Attack Narrative
A detailed, chronological account of every action taken during the engagement. Includes initial access vectors, lateral movement paths, persistence mechanisms, privilege escalation chains, and objective completion — with timestamps, screenshots, and command output.
MITRE ATT&CK Heat Map
A visual mapping of all techniques used during the engagement against the MITRE ATT&CK matrix. Color-coded to show which techniques were detected, which triggered alerts but were not investigated, and which went completely undetected by your security stack.
Detection Gap Analysis
A prioritized analysis of gaps in your detection and response capabilities. Includes specific recommendations for SIEM rule improvements, EDR policy changes, network monitoring enhancements, and SOC playbook updates to close the gaps we identified.
Remediation Roadmap
A phased remediation plan with short-term tactical fixes and long-term strategic improvements. Prioritized by risk and effort, with specific guidance for your security, IT, and engineering teams to implement within 30, 60, and 90-day windows.
Debrief Presentations
Separate presentations tailored for executive leadership, security operations, and engineering teams. Each presentation focuses on the findings and recommendations most relevant to that audience, ensuring actionable outcomes across your organization.
Is Red Teaming Right for Your Organization?
Mature Security Programs
Organizations that have already invested in security tooling, a SOC, and regular penetration testing and need to validate their defenses against realistic adversary simulation.
Regulated Industries
Financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure organizations in the Bay Area and nationwide that need to demonstrate advanced threat testing for regulatory requirements.
Post-Incident Validation
Organizations that have experienced a security incident and want to validate that their improved defenses can withstand similar or more advanced attacks.
M&A Due Diligence
Companies conducting acquisitions that need to understand the true security posture of target organizations before finalizing deals.
Compliance Framework Mapping
Our red team reports map findings to the compliance frameworks that matter to your organization.
SOC 2
Maps to CC6.1 (Logical Access), CC6.8 (Unauthorized Software), CC7.1 (Monitoring), CC7.2 (Anomaly Detection), and CC7.3 (Incident Management) Trust Services Criteria.
ISO 27001
Addresses Annex A controls including A.12.6 (Vulnerability Management), A.14.2 (Secure Development), and A.18.2 (Information Security Reviews) requirements.
NIST CSF
Aligns with Identify (ID.RA), Protect (PR.AC, PR.IP), Detect (DE.CM, DE.DP), Respond (RS.RP, RS.AN), and Recover (RC.RP) functions and categories.
PCI DSS
Fulfills Requirement 11.4 for external and internal penetration testing and Requirement 6.3 for application security, supporting your PCI DSS v4.0 compliance program.
Red Team Operations FAQ
What is the difference between red teaming and penetration testing?
Penetration testing focuses on finding as many vulnerabilities as possible within a defined scope. Red teaming simulates real-world adversaries with specific objectives — like stealing sensitive data or compromising a domain controller — while testing your detection and response capabilities. Red team engagements are typically longer, more covert, and test your entire security program holistically.
How long does a red team engagement typically take?
Most red team engagements run between 4 to 8 weeks, depending on the scope and objectives. This includes initial reconnaissance, active operations, lateral movement, objective completion, and comprehensive reporting. Some organizations opt for continuous red team engagements on a retainer basis for ongoing security validation.
Do you perform physical security testing as part of red team operations?
Yes. Our red team engagements can include physical intrusion testing such as badge cloning, tailgating, lock picking, and facility penetration. Physical vectors are often the path of least resistance for real adversaries, and testing them provides a complete picture of your security posture.
Will your red team testing disrupt our business operations?
We design every engagement with safety mechanisms and rules of engagement agreed upon before testing begins. Our operators are trained to avoid actions that could cause service disruption, data loss, or compliance violations. We maintain real-time communication channels with your designated point of contact for any safety concerns.
What MITRE ATT&CK tactics do you cover in a red team engagement?
We cover the full MITRE ATT&CK lifecycle: Initial Access, Execution, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, Defense Evasion, Credential Access, Discovery, Lateral Movement, Collection, Command and Control, Exfiltration, and Impact. Each engagement maps our activities to specific ATT&CK techniques for actionable intelligence.
Do we need to inform our security team about the red team engagement?
This depends on your testing objectives. In a "blind" red team engagement, only a small trusted group knows about the exercise, which tests your SOC and incident response team under realistic conditions. In a "purple team" variant, your defenders are informed and work alongside our operators for collaborative learning. We recommend discussing which approach best serves your goals during scoping.
What compliance frameworks require or recommend red team testing?
Several frameworks explicitly recommend adversary simulation: NIST CSF 2.0 (PR.IP, DE.CM), TIBER-EU for financial institutions, CBEST for UK financial services, PCI DSS v4.0 requirement 11.4 for service providers, and SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria CC7.2. Many mature organizations also adopt red teaming as part of ISO 27001 Annex A continuous improvement requirements.
What deliverables do we receive after a red team engagement?
You receive a comprehensive report including: executive summary with risk rating, full attack narrative with timeline, MITRE ATT&CK mapping for every technique used, detection gap analysis showing what your SOC missed, proof-of-concept evidence for each attack path, prioritized remediation recommendations, and a strategic roadmap for improving detection and response. We also deliver a presentation to your leadership and technical teams.
Ready to Test Your Defenses Against Real Adversaries?
Our San Francisco red team operators will show you exactly where your security program stands. Schedule a free scoping call today.
Book a Discovery Call